Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ASTORIA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ASTORIA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ASTORIA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
184P090784WA069001Astoria7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.3833351,-123.6500015
140A5463S1962OR071001Astoria5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.0964622,-123.7409363
140A5546S1964WA027005ASTORIA6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.9475708,-123.5809708
140A4003S1977WA049004ASTORIA3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.6120148,-123.5954056

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ASTORIA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ASTORIA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ASTORIA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ASTORIA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ASTORIA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ASTORIA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ASTORIA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ASTORIA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. OR-2012-05-10-23 | Yamhill County - January 1974

    Pattern of typical soils of association 10 that are on the Coast Range (Soil Survey of Yamhill County, Oregon; January 1974).

  2. WA-2012-05-11-22 | Grays Harbor County Area, Pacific County, and Wahkiakum County - July 1986

    Pattern of soils and parent material in general soil map unit 7 (Soil Survey of Grays Harbor County Area, Pacific County, and Wahkiakum County, Washington; July 1986).

Map Units

Map units containing ASTORIA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Astoria silt loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes5D66386239422xqor05319771:20000
Astoria silt loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes5E65796239522xror05319771:20000
Astoria medial silt loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes175D6466712527vbor05720061:24000
Astoria medial silt loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes403E186718927xdor05720061:24000
Astoria silt loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes3E7946150221zyor06719751:20000
Astoria silt loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes3F4266150321zzor06719751:20000
Astoria silt loam 30 to 60 percent slopesASF818727112542305or07119671:24000
Astoria silt loam, 5 to 30 percent slopesASE816627112502304or07119671:24000
Astoria medial silt loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes175D506271117927vbor07119671:24000
Astoria silt loam, 60 to 90 percent slopesASG49727112342306or07119671:24000
Astoria clay loam, dissected uneven, 25 to 37 percent slopesAsE107114259421jvt4or60119681:20000
Astoria clay loam, dissected uneven, 37 to 50 percent slopesAsF60614259431jvt5or60119681:20000
Astoria clay loam, ridge, 0 to 25 percent slopesAtD57714259441jvt6or60119681:20000
Astoria clay loam, uneven, 10 to 25 percent slopesAuD30814259451jvt7or60119681:20000
Astoria clay loam, uneven, 25 to 37 percent slopesAuE27514259461jvt8or60119681:20000
Astoria clay loam, dissected, 25 to 37 percent slopesArE21914259411jvt3or60119681:20000
Astoria clay loam, dissected, 5 to 25 percent slopesArD18314259401jvt2or60119681:20000
Astoria silt loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes2E2627626572366or63719811:20000
Astoria variant silt loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes3G161162673236qor63719811:20000
Astoria variant silt loam, 3 to 30 percent slopes3E108562672236por63719811:20000
Astoria silt loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes2E307064651258jor63819901:20000
Astoria silt loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes6840726222fknwa01519941:24000
Astoria silt loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes626750736562gn0wa62719791:24000
Astoria silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes57078736452gmnwa62719791:24000
Astoria silt loam, 30 to 65 percent slopes74191736672gncwa62719791:24000
Astoria silt loam, 0 to 30 percent slopes51149744432hgdwa64119801:24000
Astoria silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopesAf9420745052hjdwa64519531:31680
Astoria silt loam, 5 to 15 percent slopesAe1303745042hjcwa64519531:31680
Shelton-Astoria complex, 5 to 15 percent slopesSk690746212hn4wa64519531:31680
Hoquiam and Astoria silt loams, 5 to 15 percent slopesHs229745632hl8wa64519531:31680
Hoquiam and Astoria silt loams, 15 to 30 percent slopesHt210745642hl9wa64519531:31680
Tebo-Astoria complex, 5 to 15 percent slopesTk197746392hnqwa64519531:31680
Shelton-Astoria complex, 15 to 30 percent slopesSm169746222hn5wa64519531:31680
Tebo-Astoria complex, 15 to 30 percent slopesTm130746402hnrwa64519531:31680

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ASTORIA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .