Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the APISON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of APISON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to APISON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
12801N0843S2001TN065001Apison7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.0574989,-85.0133362
12801N0851S2001TN143001Apison7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.5716667,-84.8333359

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the APISON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the APISON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the APISON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the APISON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with APISON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the APISON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the APISON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with APISON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. TN-2010-11-02-21 | McMinn County - 2004

    lationship of soils and parent material in the Fullerton-Bodine-Rockdell and Coile-Apison-Sunlight general soil map units (Soil Survey of McMinn County, Tennessee; 2004).

  2. TN-2012-03-19-24 | McMinn County - 2004

    Relationship of soils and parent material in the Fullerton-Bodine-Rockdell and Coile-Apison-Sunlight general soil map units (Soil Survey of McMinn County, TN; 2004).

Map Units

Map units containing APISON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Apison (Townley) loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, erodedAm60003291232zjxmal04919531:20000
Apison (Townley) loam, 5 to 10 percent slopesAo60003291252zjxlal04919531:20000
Apison (Townley) loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedAn50003291242zjxkal04919531:20000
Apison (Townley) loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesAp10003291262zjxjal04919531:20000
Apison loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, erodedApC25722566558m0k2ar14319661:20000
Apison gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, erodedAsC21124566559m0k3ar14319661:20000
Apison loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesApB699566557m0k1ar14319661:20000
Apison loam, 6 to 10 percent slopesApC1275531156ktq2ga04719871:20000
Apison loam, 2 to 6 percent slopesApB415531155ktq1ga04719871:20000
Apison silt loam, eroded undulating phaseAc3325526848kp73tn01119511:20000
Apison silt loam, eroded rolling phaseAb3060526847kp72tn01119511:20000
Apison silt loam, rolling phaseAd1741526849kp74tn01119511:20000
Apison silt loam, undulating phaseAf1302526851kp76tn01119511:20000
Apison silt loam, severely eroded rolling phaseAe309526850kp75tn01119511:20000
Apison loam, 5 to 15 percent slopesApC1767101782613543tn06519801:15840
Apison-Montevallo complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes, rockyAmF11882632889p7kstn09320051:12000
Apison-Montevallo complex, 25 to 35 percent slopes, rockyAmE5383632888p7krtn09320051:12000
Apison-Montevallo complex, 12 to 25 percent slopesAmD4425632887p7kqtn09320051:12000
Salacoa-Apison complex, 5 to 12 percent slopesSbC3667632861p7jwtn09320051:12000
Apison-Montevallo complex, 5 to 12 percent slopesAmC2359632886p7kptn09320051:12000
Apison-Sunlight complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, very rockyAsF5016526162knhztn10719991:24000
Sunlight-Apison complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes, very rockySuD2834526161knhytn10719991:24000
Sunlight-Apison complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes, very rockySuC2597526160knhxtn10719991:24000
Coghill-Apison complex, 5 to 12 percent slopesCgC1656526182knjmtn10719991:24000
Apison-Coile complex, 25 to 60 percent slopesAcF1630526184knjptn10719991:24000
Coghill-Apison complex, 12 to 25 percent slopesCgD1209526183knjntn10719991:24000
Apison-Sunlight complex, 5 to 12 percent slopesAsC929526163knj0tn10719991:24000
Apison-Sunlight-Salacoa complex, 25 to 65 percent slopesAsF892315397751np85tn12119681:15840
Sunlight-Townley-Apison complex, 10 to 25 percent slopesSyD246615397731np83tn12119681:15840
Sunlight-Apison complex, 5 to 25 percent slopesSuD36015405551nq2btn12119681:15840
Apison-Armuchee complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes, erodedApC27284523726kkzdtn13919971:24000
Apison-Armuchee complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes, erodedApD23244523727kkzftn13919971:24000
Apison silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes, erodedAnC2766523725kkzctn13919971:24000
Apison-Sunlight-Salacoa complex, 25 to 65 percent slopesAsF4492728840sgdztn14320031:24000
Apison-Sunlight complex, 5 to 12 percent slopesApC1851530238301hftn14520051:24000
Apison-Sunlight complex, 12 to 25 percent slopesApD1373349769301hytn14520051:24000
Apison-Sunlight complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, very rockyApF1331530236301hdtn14520051:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the APISON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .