Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ANT FLAT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ANT FLAT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ANT FLAT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ANT FLAT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ANT FLAT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ANT FLAT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ANT FLAT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ANT FLAT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ANT FLAT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ANT FLAT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ANT FLAT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. ID-2010-08-30-06 | Franklin County Area - 2008

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in general soil map units 5 (Parleys-Ant Flat-Winwell) and 7 (Wheelon-Collinston-Winwell) (Soil Survey of Franklin County Area, Idaho; 2008).

  2. ID-2010-08-30-07 | Franklin County Area - 2008

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in general soil map units 2 (Windernot-Delish-Lewnot) and 6 (Oxford-Ant Flat-Banida) (Soil Survey of Franklin County Area, Idaho; 2008).

  3. UT-2012-03-22-07 | Rich County - July 1982

    Typical pattern of soils in general map unit 6 (Soil Survey of Rich County, UT; 1982).

  4. UT-2012-05-10-06 | Rich County - July 1982

    Typical pattern of soils in general map unit 6 (Soil Survey of Rich County, Utah; July 1982).

Map Units

Map units containing ANT FLAT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Swanpeak-Dutchcanyon-Ant Flat complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes204237215438855n8id71220081:24000
Pinehollow-Ant Flat-Sheep Creek complex, 2 to 35 percent slopes161146915894461qbygid71220081:24000
Swanpeak-Ant Flat complex, 1 to 20 percent slopes201138715439255ndid71220081:24000
Ant Flat silty clay loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes170023875142l4dlid71220081:24000
Ant Flat silty clay loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes349815426455j8id71220081:24000
Ant Flat silty clay loam, 4 to 12 percent slopes239315426355j7id71220081:24000
Ant Flat silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes25669485262j8ymid71419971:24000
Ant Flat silty clay loam, 2 to 4 percent slopes32577485273j8yzid71419971:24000
Ant Flat silty clay loam, 4 to 12 percent slopes4970485284j8zbid71419971:24000
Ant Flat-Oxford complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes6770485306j901id71419971:24000
Ant Flat-Oxford complex, 4 to 12 percent slopes5220485295j8zpid71419971:24000
Ant Flat gravelly silt loam, 12 to 30 percent slopes15C7931591115bkmid7161:24000
Ant Flat silty clay loam, 4 to 12 percent slopes15B2661591055bkfid7161:24000
Ant Flat-Naphide complex, 3 to 50 percent slopes, very stony567184924989352pzwsut0131:24000
Burhollow-Ant Flat, very stony-Starvation, extremely stony complex, 4 to 40 percent slopesZVD172214439291kgjcut0131:24000
Ant Flat stony loam, 25 to 40 percent slopes, erodedAHE2814839891lt6mut0131:24000
Ant Flat-Acord association, 10 to 30 percent slopes57982481259j4shut60119851:24000
ANT FLAT LOAM, 6 TO 20 PERCENT SLOPESAND7380482661j67qut60319681:20000
ANT FLAT-DESPAIN ASSOCIATION, ERODEDAOE25232482662j67rut60319681:20000
HOSKIN-SCAVE ASSOCIATIONHNG3140482732j6b0ut60319681:20000
Ant Flat silt loam, dry, 10 to 25 percent slopesAFD2320503804jx7rut60419801:24000
Swanpeak-Dutchcanyon-Ant Flat complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes2045423962662lfhxut60419801:24000
Ant Flat loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesAeD1360482450j60xut60819811:24000
Ant Flat loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesAnD1795506506k01xut60919741:24000
Ant Flat-Henefer-Skutum complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes10522890508145k1rsut61319991:24000
Ant Flat loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes10410079508272k1wwut61319991:24000
Manila-Ant Flat loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes1543995508200k1tkut61319991:24000
Ant Flat loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes1023419508250k1w5ut61319991:24000
Ant Flat loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes1032996508261k1wjut61319991:24000
Manila-Ant Flat loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes1551789508199k1tjut61319991:24000
Ant Flat loam, low rainfall, 4 to 8 percent slopesAkC2485482199j5rtut62719711:24000
Ant Flat stony loam, 8 to 25 percent slopesAHD2380482197j5rrut62719711:24000
Ant Flat stony loam, 25 to 40 percent slopes, erodedAHE21470482198j5rsut62719711:24000
Ant Flat-Borvant complex, 4 to 25 percent slopesALD1080482200j5rvut62719711:24000
Ant Flat-Datwyler families-Pachic Palexerolls complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes, extremely stonySd741728102302trcmut6291:24000
Ant Flat-Cristo-Lizzant families complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes1031029932432632zscbut6451:24000
Ant Flat family, 25 to 60 percent slopesHUG146822181652dg5qut6511:24000
Ant Flat-Henefer-Arva complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes50112914802261lp97wy0411:24000
Ant Flat loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes50010214802291lp9bwy0411:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ANT FLAT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .