Soil Data Explorer - ANNISTON

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ANNISTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ANNISTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ANNISTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ANNISTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ANNISTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the ANNISTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the ANNISTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ANNISTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the ANNISTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the ANNISTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ANNISTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. AL-2012-04-24-13 | Calhoun County - September 1961

   Some of the general soil areas, or soil associations, in relation to topographic position and parent material (Soil Survey of Calhoun County, Alabama; September 1961).

Map Units

Map units containing ANNISTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Anniston and Allen gravelly loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded	AcB2	6715	523281	kkj1	al015	1959	1:20000
Anniston and Allen stony loams, 10 to 25 percent slopes	AdE	4937	523286	kkj6	al015	1959	1:20000
Anniston and Allen gravelly loams, 6 to 10 percent slopes,eroded	AcC2	3871	523282	kkj2	al015	1959	1:20000
Anniston gravelly clay loam 6 to 10 percent slopes, severely eroded	AbC3	3648	523277	kkhx	al015	1959	1:20000
Anniston gravelly clay loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, severely eroded	AbD3	2881	523278	kkhy	al015	1959	1:20000
Anniston and Allen stony loams, 0 to 10 percent slopes	AdC	2539	523285	kkj5	al015	1959	1:20000
Anniston and Allen gravelly loams, 10 to 15 percent slopes, eroded	AcD2	2037	523283	kkj3	al015	1959	1:20000
Anniston gravelly clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded	AbE3	1294	523279	kkhz	al015	1959	1:20000
Anniston and Allen gravelly loams, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded	AcE2	1231	523284	kkj4	al015	1959	1:20000
Anniston gravelly clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, severely eroded	AbB3	816	523276	kkhw	al015	1959	1:20000
Anniston and Allen gravelly loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	AcA	154	523280	kkj0	al015	1959	1:20000
Anniston loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	AsB	996	523214	kkfw	al121	1969	1:20000
Anniston loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes	AsD	763	523215	kkfx	al121	1969	1:20000
Anniston sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes	AnD	433	884413	yp9g	ga015	2013	1:12000
Anniston sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes	AnE	389	1611191	1r2kx	ga015	2013	1:12000
Anniston sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes	AnC	321	1611190	1r2kw	ga015	2013	1:12000
Anniston-Urban land complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes	AoD	175	2554231	2qvpl	ga015	2013	1:12000
Anniston sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	AnB	114	1611189	1r2kv	ga015	2013	1:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ANNISTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).