Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ANDRES soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ANDRES, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ANDRES were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
11085IL1050281985IL105028Andres2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.7053722,-88.4702917
11086IL1130301986IL113030Andres2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.7565111,-88.6766722
11089P035485IL105022aAndres7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.7408577,-88.4819889
111CBE80591980IN007059Andres3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.725175,-87.1921528

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ANDRES soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ANDRES series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ANDRES series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ANDRES series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ANDRES share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ANDRES series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ANDRES series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ANDRES, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing ANDRES as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Andres silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes293A6314070811j75qil00720061:12000
Andres silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes293A127021087362t6zxil03120081:12000
Andres silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes293A1134111440092t6zxil06320051:12000
Andres silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes293A73661755712t6zxil07519801:15840
Andres silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes293A406329804632t6zxil09120031:12000
Andres silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes293B669804642t6zzil09120031:12000
Andres silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes293A7317156252t6zxil09320071:12000
Andres silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes293B174013863772t6zzil09920061:12000
Andres silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes293A6252634762t6zxil09920061:12000
Andres silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes293A253231769552t6zxil10519911:15840
Andres silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes293A11321991112t6zxil11320001:12000
Andres silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes293A1620816131882t6zxil18320061:12000
Andres silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes293A28946186872t6zxil19720021:12000
Andres silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes293B10592623462t6zzil19720021:12000
Andres silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes293A10011740135v2bil20119971:12000
Andres silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesAnA15001645212t6zxin00719851:15840
Andres silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesAnB2391645222t6zzin00719851:15840
Andres silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopesAtA61661613432t6zxin07319851:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ANDRES soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .