Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ANDERS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ANDERS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ANDERS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ANDERS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ANDERS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ANDERS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ANDERS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ANDERS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ANDERS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ANDERS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ANDERS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. WA-2012-05-11-11 | Whitman County - April 1980

    Typical landscape in the Anders-Benge-Kuhl association (Soil Survey of Whitman County, Washington; April 1980).

Map Units

Map units containing ANDERS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Anders very fine sandy loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes4B76661586222nor05519921:24000
Anders very fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent south slopes5D42861588222qor05519921:24000
Anders very fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes4C29361587222por05519921:24000
Anders-Kuhl extremely rocky silt loams, 0 to 15 percent slopesAMC784056812728wnwa00119651:20000
Anders-Kuhl very rocky silt loams, 0 to 15 percent slopesALC112796812628wmwa00119651:20000
Anders-Kuhl very stony silt loams, 0 to 15 percent slopesAKC69656812528wlwa00119651:20000
Anders cobbly silt loam, 0 to 15 percent slopesACC14316812428wkwa00119651:20000
Anders silt loam, 5 to 20 percent slopesABC12736812328wjwa00119651:20000
Anders silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopesABB7676812228whwa00119651:20000
Bakeoven-Anders complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes19109446879029l1wa02519791:24000
Anders silt loam, 0 to 10 percent slopes116256870229h6wa02519791:24000
Anders-Bakeoven-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes31468156862529dqwa04319781:24000
Anders silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes1189016860329d0wa04319781:24000
Anders gravelly silt loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes218666861429dcwa04319781:24000
Anders-Kuhl complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes5548246854629b5wa07519751:20000
Kuhl-Anders complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes46146896854229b1wa07519751:20000
Anders silt loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes4430768535299twa07519751:20000
Anders-Lickskillet complex, 5 to 25 percent slopesAeD370697732blrwa62319701:20000
Anders silt loam, 0 to 7 percent slopesAdB295697722blqwa62319701:20000
Anders silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes9604707302clmwa64819871:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ANDERS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .