Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the AMHERST soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of AMHERST, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to AMHERST were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the AMHERST soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the AMHERST series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the AMHERST series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the AMHERST series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with AMHERST share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the AMHERST series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the AMHERST series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with AMHERST, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing AMHERST as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Castner-Amherst loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes4510402342545chfvmt02719791:24000
Amherst-Absarokee clay loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes176933342401ch96mt02719791:24000
Absarokee-Amherst clay loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes63049342561chgcmt02719791:24000
Amherst-Absarokee clay loams, 8 to 25 percent slopes181109342412ch9kmt02719791:24000
Amherst clay loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes310013344696ckp7mt06919891:24000
Amherst-Delplain complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes55012344718ckpymt06919891:24000
Amherst clay loam, 6 to 25 percent slopes42966344707ckplmt06919891:24000
Amherst-Maginnis channery clay loams, 4 to 7 percent slopesAp4362345677clpwmt11119661:20000
Amherst clay loam, 7 to 15 percent slopesAo3286345676clpvmt11119661:20000
Amherst-Maginnis complex, hillyAVd5932345850clwgmt60719701:24000
Amherst complex, hillyAVc5901345849clwfmt60719701:24000
Amherst loam, undulatingAu2037345865clwymt60719701:24000
Amherst loam, rollingAVa1729345847clwcmt60719701:24000
Amherst complex, rollingAVb253345848clwdmt60719701:24000
Cabba-Castner-Amherst complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes670D2288190236821vkqmt62420211:24000
Cabba-Castner-Amherst complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes335D1424514989250z7mt63920001:24000
Absarokee-Amherst complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes330C938214988250yxmt63920001:24000
Absarokee-Amherst complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes330D493914988350yymt63920001:24000
Castner-Amherst complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes372D1288149934510lmt63920001:24000
Castner-Amherst complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes372E885149935510mmt63920001:24000
Wayden-Amherst-Winifred complex, 8 to 45 percent slopes432E362149997512mmt63920001:24000
Absarokee-Amherst-Castner complex, 4 to 8 percent slopes67253348193cpb1mt65519751:24000
Amherst-Absarokee-Castner complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes84562348208cpbjmt65519751:24000
Absarokee-Amherst complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes330C3075361446d43kmt65519751:24000
Absarokee-Amherst complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes330D1396361445d43jmt65519751:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the AMHERST soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .