Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ALTAR soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ALTAR, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ALTAR were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ALTAR soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ALTAR series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ALTAR series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ALTAR series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ALTAR share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ALTAR series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ALTAR series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ALTAR, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. AZ-2010-08-30-03 | Pima County, Eastern Part - 2003

    Typical soil and landscape relationship on the east side of the Baboquivari Mountains (Soil Survey of Pima County, Arizona, Eastern Part; 2003).

  2. AZ-2011-05-27-26 | Pima County, Eastern Part - 2003

    Typical soil and landscape relationship on the east side of the Baboquirari Mountains (Soil Survey of Pima County, Arizona, Eastern Part; 2003).

  3. TX-2010-11-02-04 | Big Bend National Park -

    Altar, Brewster, Chillicotal, Hurds, Leyva, Lingua

  4. TX-2012-05-09-04 | Big Bend National Park - 2011

    Relationship of soil mapping units, geologic formations, and landscapes of the Chisos Formation, igneous intrusions, and gravelly alluvium of both mid-Pleistocene and Holocene ages (Soil Survey of Big Bend National Park, Texas; 2011).

Map Units

Map units containing ALTAR as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Altar family soils, Penthouse soils and Urban land, 3 to 8 percent slopes4373091582551ym6az63920121:24000
Altar soils, Bodecker soils and Urban land, 1 to 3 percent slopes4191176582391ylpaz63920121:24000
Altar soils, Bodecker soils, and Urban land, 3 to 7 percent slopes415507582351ylkaz63920121:24000
Altar-Sasabe complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes125365537381sxhaz66919931:24000
Altar-Mallet complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes134024550521v8waz67120001:24000
Bodecker-Altar-Riverwash complex, 1 to 10 percent slopes7404425135962pzq0az6731:24000
Bodecker-Altar-Riverwash complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes665125135862pzppaz6731:24000
Ustic Torriorthents-Altar complex, 15 to 65 percent slopes695127024512922n8ryaz6871:24000
Altar-Bodecker-Riverwash association, 0 to 7 percent slopes, floodedALB33968815661wcrntx37720121:31680
Altar gravelly sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopesAAC262824068582lsjltx62119821:24000
Altar-Chilicotal complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesACC1410025072522q3crtx62720121:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ALTAR soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .