Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ALPOWA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ALPOWA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ALPOWA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ALPOWA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ALPOWA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ALPOWA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ALPOWA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ALPOWA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ALPOWA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ALPOWA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ALPOWA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. ID-2010-08-30-10 | Lewis and Nez Perce Counties - 2004

    Generalized distribution of the dominant soils in the immediate Lewiston area (Soil Survey of Lewis and Nez Perce Counties, Idaho; 2004).

  2. WA-2012-05-11-13 | Whitman County - April 1980

    Typical landscape in the Kuhl-Alpowa association (Soil Survey of Whitman County, Washington; April 1980).

  3. WA-2012-05-11-14 | Whitman County - April 1980

    Typical landscape in the Starbuck-Alpowa association (Soil Survey of Whitman County, Washington; April 1980).

Map Units

Map units containing ALPOWA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Lickskillet-Alpowa-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes7713950796922nxqid61119941:24000
Alpowa-Lickskillet complex, 35 to 50 percent slopes84764796952nxtid61119941:24000
Alpowa-Lickskillet complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes72846796842nxgid61119941:24000
Oliphant-Alpowa complex, 20 to 40 percent slopes103536795672nspid61119941:24000
Alpowa gravelly loam, 20 to 60 percent slopes610222823952rqxid70719761:24000
Alpowa loam, 3 to 12 percent slopes46155823732rq6id70719761:24000
Alpowa loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes32097823622rpvid70719761:24000
Alpowa loam, wet5529823842rqkid70719761:24000
Kuhl-Alpowa complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes45517486854129b0wa07519751:20000
Starbuck-Alpowa complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes95135376859629cswa07519751:20000
Alpowa cobbly silt loam, 30 to 65 percent slopes3398868524299gwa07519751:20000
Alpowa variant silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes2477694182b79wa60319841:24000
Alpowa stony silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes1398693912b6fwa60319841:24000
Alpowa very stony silt loam, 25 to 65 percent slopesAaF3897697702blnwa62319701:20000
Alpowa very stony silt loam, 10 to 25 percent slopesAaD2120697692blmwa62319701:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ALPOWA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .