Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ALLOR soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ALLOR, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ALLOR were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ALLOR soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ALLOR series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ALLOR series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ALLOR series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ALLOR share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ALLOR series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ALLOR series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ALLOR, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NV-2012-05-09-09 | Lander County, North Part - May 1992

    Typical relationship of general soil map units and landscapes: Playas (1); Buffaran-Allor-Chlara (11); Puett-Wieland-Genaw (14); and Itca-Reluctan-Punchbowl (20) (Soil Survey of Lander County, Nevada, North Part; May 1992).

  2. NV-2012-05-09-10 | Lander County, North Part - May 1992

    Typical relationship of general soil map units and landscapes: Sonoma-Rixie-Paranat (3); Orovada-Broyles-Shabliss (7); Buffaran-Allor-Chiara (11); Bioya-Chiara-Cortez (12); Robson-Akerue-Buffaran (16); Sumine-Chen-Rock outcrop (19); and Quarz-Walti-Glean (21) (Soil Survey of Lander County, Nevada, North Part; May 1992).

  3. NV-2012-05-09-13 | Lander County, South Part - November 1991

    General soil map units representative of those on a bolson that is an internally drained intermontane basin (Soil Survey of Lander County, Nevada, South Part; November 1991).

  4. NV-2012-05-09-14 | Lander County, South Part - November 1991

    General soil map units representative of those on a semibolson that is an externally drained intermontane basin (Soil Survey of Lander County, Nevada, South Part; November 1991).

Map Units

Map units containing ALLOR as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Allor-Wieland association30713725193752qj97nv61219681:24000
Buffaran-Spasprey-Allor association254317795479128j2krnv76819851:63360
Allor-Wieland association307114650479172j2m5nv76819851:63360
Spasprey-Allor association331012205479216j2nlnv76819851:63360
Allor-Orovada association, moderately sloping307211585479173j2m6nv76819851:63360
Wieland-Allor association16708915479066j2hrnv76819851:63360
Zaidy-Allor association30815435479177j2mbnv76819851:63360
Spasprey-Allor-Orovada association33145100479218j2nnnv76819851:63360
Beoska-Allor association1734320479075j2j1nv76819851:63360
Old Camp-Allor-Puett association27923840479156j2lnnv76819851:63360
Allor-Kelk association30732255479174j2m7nv76819851:63360
Allor-Orovada association, nearly level30742190479175j2m8nv76819851:63360
Wieland-Allor association167015170479491j2ygnv77519851:24000
Wieland-Oxcorel-Allor association167113180479492j2yhnv77519851:24000
Allor-Wieland association30719330479610j329nv77519851:24000
Tenabo, gravelly-Allor-Tenabo association10403380479398j2vgnv77519851:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ALLOR soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .