Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CANDLER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CANDLER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CANDLER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
154S49_0051972FL610001Candler3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties28.303194,-81.6034393
154S27_0061974-FL053-S27_006Candler3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties28.532917,-82.5174942
154S51_0281978-FL101-S51_028Candler3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties28.4033108,-82.4784241
154S51_0291978-FL101-S51_029Candler3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties28.430603,-82.5485001
154S01_1021980-FL001-S01_102Candler3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties29.5851841,-82.5172195
154S01_1031980-FL001-S01_103Candler3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties29.567709,-82.5853882
154S09_0161981-FL017-S09_016Candler3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties28.9484005,-82.4340744
154S54_0031982-FL107-S54_003Candler3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties29.6855927,-81.7983932
154S60_0051982FL119001Candler3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties28.8446465,-81.9622116
154S53_0221983-FL105-S53_022Candler3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties27.8862553,-81.5482788
154S54_0231984-FL107-S54_023Candler3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties29.6928616,-81.9990082
154S38_0101986-FL075-S38_010Candler3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties29.3853588,-82.6127243
155S64_0051973-FL127-S64_005Candler3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties28.9388027,-81.2565765
15581P045781FL001001Candler6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties29.6335831,-82.3665314
n/aS35_0041969-FL069-S35_004Candler3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CANDLER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CANDLER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CANDLER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CANDLER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CANDLER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CANDLER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CANDLER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CANDLER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. FL-2012-04-25-30 | Polk County - October 1990

    Relationship of soils to topography (Soil Survey of Polk County, Florida; October 1990).

Map Units

Map units containing CANDLER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Candler fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes2249413206812shkffl00119821:15840
Candler fine sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes6822093207692v17jfl00119821:15840
Candler-Apopka complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes471754320737brrcfl00119821:15840
Candler fine sand4372414732901lg2hfl00919901:24000
Candler-Urban land complex5181114732911lg2jfl00919901:24000
Candler fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes3740783210662shkffl01719851:20000
Candler fine sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes468943210762v17jfl01719851:20000
Candler-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes321377321069bs32fl01719851:20000
Candler fine sand, 8 to 12 percent slopes41154321078bs3cfl01719851:20000
Candler fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes6161013843851hgklfl04919811:20000
Candler fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes14901953220762shkffl05319761:20000
Candler fine sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes15127863220772v17jfl05319761:20000
Candler-Urban land complex161005322078bt4mfl05319761:20000
Candler fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes72884514070122shkffl05719861:20000
Candler-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes9740014070141j73kfl05719861:20000
Candler fine sand, 5 to 12 percent slopes888514070131j73jfl05719861:20000
Candler fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopes66011014140502ttl5fl07519901:24000
Otela-Candler complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes123800014140562y51jfl07519901:24000
Candler fine sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes771045014141202v17jfl07519901:24000
Candler-Apopka complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes7720014140511jgfkfl07519901:24000
Candler fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes4289683231542shkffl09519861:20000
Candler fine sand, 5 to 12 percent slopes512769323165bv8pfl09519861:20000
Candler-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes77958323173bv8yfl09519861:20000
Candler-Apopka fine sands, 5 to 12 percent slopes66921323172bv8xfl09519861:20000
Candler-Urban land complex, 5 to 12 percent slopes81812323174bv8zfl09519861:20000
Candler sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes7603314838472t3z1fl09719761:20000
Candler sand, 5 to 12 percent slopes8214714838482w0q4fl09719761:20000
Candler fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes13293453231812shkffl10119801:20000
Candler fine sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes1420303231822v17jfl10119801:20000
Candler-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes36930323205bv9zfl10119801:20000
Candler sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes39749614249952t3z1fl10519871:20000
Candler-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes50807014250391jtw0fl10519871:20000
Candler sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes4280914249961jttmfl10519871:20000
Candler fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes1296503233722shkffl10719851:15840
Candler fine sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes288203233832v17jfl10719851:15840
Candler-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes54960323421bvjyfl10719851:15840
Candler sand, 12 to 25 percent slopes44540323410bvjlfl10719851:15840
Candler sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes4201303236472t3z1fl11919851:24000
Candler sand, bouldery subsurface, 0 to 5 percent slopes652964323675bvt4fl11919851:24000
Candler sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes52199323658bvslfl11919851:24000
Candler sand, 8 to 12 percent slopes52604323661bvspfl11919851:24000
Candler sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes87384116031352t3z1fl60719701:20000
Candler sand, 5 to 12 percent slopes93795216031362w0q4fl60719701:20000
Candler sand, 12 to 40 percent slopes10420915422641nrvgfl60719701:20000
Candler sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes2219180917129052t3z1fl60819791:15840
Candler sand, 5 to 12 percent slopes232349317129062w0q4fl60819791:15840
Candler clay, overwash, 0 to 2 percent slopes2473017129071vhf2fl60819791:15840
Astatula and Candler sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes210636425136132r3gxfl60919681:24000
Astatula and Candler sands, 5 to 12 percent slopes31614325136142r8gsfl60919681:24000
Astatula and Candler sands, flora rich, 0 to 5 percent slopes13707327270342r8h5fl60919681:24000
Astatula and Candler sands, flora rich, 5 to 12 percent slopes14174227270352r8h6fl60919681:24000
Candler sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes19107228220312t3z1fl60919681:24000
Astatula and Candler sands, 12 to 20 percent slopes426525136152r8grfl60919681:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CANDLER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .