Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the WINTERCANYON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of WINTERCANYON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to WINTERCANYON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the WINTERCANYON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the WINTERCANYON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WINTERCANYON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WINTERCANYON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with WINTERCANYON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WINTERCANYON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WINTERCANYON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with WINTERCANYON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing WINTERCANYON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Analulu-Wintercanyon complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7799CO279731206651sghkor60720181:24000
Analulu-Wintercanyon-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes7800DO122731206661sghlor60720181:24000
Wintercanyon-Porch-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7729CO24731206371sgdror60720181:24000
Deck-Wintercanyon-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes7781DO15831206581sgh2or60720181:24000
Eastpine-Wintercanyon complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes7730BO11231202361nxywor60720181:24000
Deck-Kettlecreek-Wintercanyon complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7782CO831206591sgh3or60720181:24000
Porch-Hondu-Wintercanyon complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes7819CO2259733854642xj8qor62620181:24000
Porch-Wintercanyon complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes7818CO1582733854622xj8nor62620181:24000
Hondu-Porch-Wintercanyon complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7820CO1551933854682xj8tor62620181:24000
Porch-Wintercanyon-Bluecanyon complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes7817CO1371933854612xj8lor62620181:24000
Porch-Wintercanyon complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes7818NO1324533854632xj8mor62620181:24000
Porch-Hondu-Wintercanyon complex, 2 to 25 percent slopes7819NO1277633854652xj8por62620181:24000
Wintercanyon-Bluecanyon-Porch complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes7816CO1226433854602xj8jor62620181:24000
Bluecanyon-Wintercanyon-Porch complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes7815NO915533854592xj8kor62620181:24000
Porch-Kettlecreek-Wintercanyon complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7756CO496331224261sgflor62620181:24000
Hondu-Porch-Wintercanyon complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes7820BO351033854672xj8sor62620181:24000
Porch-Kettlecreek-Wintercanyon complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes7756BO247531221201q70zor62620181:24000
Eastpine-Wintercanyon complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes7730BO173631220931nxywor62620181:24000
Wintercanyon-Porch-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7729CO161131224201sgdror62620181:24000
Analulu-Wintercanyon-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes7800DO142433854571sghlor62620181:24000
Eastpine-Wintercanyon complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes7730AO97531225151v6lzor62620181:24000
Deck-Kettlecreek-Wintercanyon complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7782CO76231224371sgh3or62620181:24000
Analulu-Wintercanyon-Porch complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes7820AO57733854662xj8ror62620181:24000
Deck-Wintercanyon-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes7781DO40231224361sgh2or62620181:24000
Deck-Analulu-Wintercanyon complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes4085CO10133853472qczsor62620181:24000
Deck-Wintercanyon complex, 20 to 50 percent south slopes4084CO1633854732w6bfor62620181:24000
Slicklog-Wintercanyon-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent north slopes3506DN724371352dvt6or63120181:24000
Slicklog-Wintercanyon-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent north slopes278207846692v38or67019991:24000
Wintercanyon-Porch-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes7729CO2331144912ygd9wa71420181:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the WINTERCANYON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .