Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GRAVERAET soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GRAVERAET, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GRAVERAET were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
93B90P105690MI061001Graveraet7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.6811104,-88.8577805
93B90P105790MI061002Graveraet6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.7075005,-88.9261093
93B04N0456S2003MI131003Graveraet7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.8554268,-88.9537125
94B04N0484S2004MI153037GRAVERAET1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.2891655,-85.8771744

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GRAVERAET soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GRAVERAET series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRAVERAET series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRAVERAET series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GRAVERAET share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRAVERAET series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRAVERAET series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GRAVERAET, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MI-2012-02-06-18 | Houghton County Area - October 1991

    Diagrammatic cross section of Houghton County showing the topography, elevation, general soil texture, landforms, and dominant soils and their drainage class (Soil Survey of Houghton County Area, Michigan; October 1991).

  2. MI-2012-02-06-21 | Houghton County Area - October 1991

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Graveraet-Misery-Ocqueoc association (Soil Survey of Houghton County Area, Michigan; October 1991).

Map Units

Map units containing GRAVERAET as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Graveraet fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes, stony8096B4724508012n883mi01319841:20000
Graveraet fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, stony8096C2224508022n884mi01319841:20000
Graveraet fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes, stony35B16418416124fz0cmi06119891:20000
Graveraet-Misery complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes131B8414416066fyyhmi06119891:20000
Graveraet fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, stony35D7740416125fz0dmi06119891:20000
Graveraet-Kalkaska complex, dissected, 15 to 70 percent slopes144F7514416085fyz3mi06119891:20000
Graveraet fine sandy loam, dissected, 1 to 12 percent slopes, stony84B7159416164fz1nmi06119891:20000
Graveraet-Ocqueoc-Kalkaska complex, dissected, 1 to 12 percent slopes148B5151416089fyz7mi06119891:20000
Graveraet-Ocqueoc-Kalkaska complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes59B4281416140fz0wmi06119891:20000
Graveraet fine sandy loam, dissected, 15 to 60 percent slopes, stony84E2550416166fz1qmi06119891:20000
Graveraet-Misery-Cathro complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes8166A237524847992pdmtmi06119891:20000
Graveraet fine sandy loam, dissected, 8 to 35 percent slopes, stony84D2263416165fz1pmi06119891:20000
Graveraet-Ocqueoc-Kalkaska complex, dissected, 8 to 35 percent slopes148D2003416090fyz8mi06119891:20000
Graveraet fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes35E154416126fz0fmi06119891:20000
Menominee, sandy substratum-Graveraet complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes74B3856631270p5wkmi09520041:24000
Graveraet fine sandy loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes16B1261627453p1xfmi09520041:24000
Graveraet fine sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes16B4237416344fz7gmi09719941:20000
Graveraet fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes16D1170416345fz7hmi09719941:20000
Graveraet fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes, stony40B423914564221kwjcmi13120071:24000
Graveraet fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, stony40D351214564231kwjdmi13120071:24000
Graveraet fine sandy loam, dissected, 8 to 35 percent slopes, stony41E95414564261kwjhmi13120071:24000
Graveraet fine sandy loam, dissected, 1 to 12 percent slopes, stony41C33114564251kwjgmi13120071:24000
Sarona, dense substratum-Gogebic, sandy substratum-Graveraet complex, 12 to 35 percent slopes8294D24216748991t6w0mi13120071:24000
Graveraet-Misery-Cathro complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes8166A16416748561t6tmmi13120071:24000
Graveraet fine sandy loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes505B533514570421kx5cmi15320071:24000
Graveraet-Gulliver complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes73B331514570271kx4wmi15320071:24000
Graveraet-Angelica complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes526B208714570471kx5jmi15320071:24000
Graveraet fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes505D26114570411kx5bmi15320071:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GRAVERAET soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .