Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the CRACKERVILLE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of CRACKERVILLE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to CRACKERVILLE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the CRACKERVILLE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the CRACKERVILLE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CRACKERVILLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CRACKERVILLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with CRACKERVILLE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the CRACKERVILLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the CRACKERVILLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with CRACKERVILLE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing CRACKERVILLE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Clasoil-Crackerville complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes552E3397154929566qmt61620031:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes552D2311154928566pmt61620031:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville complex, 4 to 8 percent slopes552C855154927566nmt61620031:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately impacted1552D60915525456k6mt61620031:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes752D57215504056b9mt61620031:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville complex, 4 to 8 percent slopes, moderately impacted1552C46215526556kkmt61620031:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes752E39115504156bbmt61620031:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes552F339154930566rmt61620031:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, moderately impacted1552E33915526656klmt61620031:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, moderately impacted1752E175612116njypmt61620031:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes752E2881445664vffmt62119971:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes552D1031445014vcbmt62119971:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes752D831445654vfdmt62119971:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes552E721445024vccmt62119971:24000
Catgulch, bouldery-Crackerville-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes1591E167315063251r3mt62719981:24000
Crackerville-Bielenberg-Catgulch, bouldery, complex, 20 to 35 percent slopes1283E90515057751pbmt62719981:24000
Crackerville-Bielenberg-Catgulch, bouldery, complex, 8 to 20 percent slopes1282D89215057651p9mt62719981:24000
Crackerville-Catgulch complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes, bouldery1280D74715057451p7mt62719981:24000
Crackerville-Bielenberg-Catgulch, bouldery, complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes, warm1286E45415058051pfmt62719981:24000
Connieo, bouldery-Crackerville-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes1595E41815063351r4mt62719981:24000
Crackerville-Catgulch, bouldery-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes1281D39915057551p8mt62719981:24000
Connieo, very stony-Crackerville, stony-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes2691F2341509795239mt62719981:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes552E72417029001v508mt63520061:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes552D39617028991v507mt63520061:24000
Connieo, very stony-Crackerville, stony-Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes2691F6817031171v578mt63520061:24000
Catgulch, bouldery-Crackerville-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes1591E4817030611v55gmt63520061:24000
Connieo-Burtoner-Crackerville complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes865E150623839462l0phmt63720141:24000
Burtoner-Crackerville-Connieo complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes865D79823778902ktd4mt63720141:24000
Crackerville-Veatch complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes338E44313838611hg0pmt63720141:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes552D7251458134wqnmt64419951:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville complex, 4 to 8 percent slopes552C6461458124wqmmt64419951:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes752E4171458824wswmt64419951:24000
Clasoil-Crackerville complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes552E2851458144wqpmt64419951:24000
Weed-Cohagen-Crackerville, very stony complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes553931368682ypp4wy6291:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the CRACKERVILLE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .