Premise
SSURGO is a digital, high-resolution (1:24,000), soil survey database produced by the USDA-NRCS. It is one of the largest and most complete spatial databases in the world; and is available for nearly the entire USA at no cost. These data are distributed as a combination of geographic and text data, representing soil map units and their associated properties. Unfortunately the text files do not come with column headers, so a template is required to make sense of the data. Alternatively, one can use an MS Access template to attach column names, generate reports, and other such tasks. CSV file can be exported from the MS Access database for further use. A follow-up post with text file headers, and complete PostgreSQL database schema will contain details on implementing a SSURGO database without using MS Access.

If you happen to have some of the SSURGO tabular data that includes column names, the following R code may be of general interest for resolving the 1:many:many hierarchy of relationships required to make a thematic map.

 
This is the format we want the data to be in

    mukey     clay      silt      sand water_storage
   458581 20.93750 20.832237 20.861842     14.460000
   458584 43.11513 30.184868 26.700000     23.490000
   458593 50.00000 27.900000 22.100000     22.800000
   458595 34.04605 14.867763 11.776974     18.900000

 
So we can make a map like this

 
Premise:
The current default database back-end used by the GRASS vector model is DBF (as of GRASS 6.5), however this is probably going to be changed (to SQLite) in GRASS 7. The DBF back-end works OK, however it tends to be very sensitive (i.e. breaks) when reserved words occur in column names or portions of a query. Complex UPDATE statements don't work, and just about anything more complex than a simple SELECT statement usually results in an error. Switching to the SQLite (or Postgresql, etc.) back-end solves most of these problems.

Currently GRASS uses a single SQLite (file-based) database per mapset-- convenient if you are interested in joining attribute tables between vectors; but not set-in-stone as the final approach that will be used by default in GRASS 7. Regardless, converting the back-end is a fairly simple matter. Finally, taking the time to convert to an SQLite or Postgresql back-end will undoubtably save you time and sanity if you ever find yourself working with vector+attribute data on a regular basis. Having access to a complete implementation of SQL can make extracting, summarizing, joining, and re-formatting (column names, types, etc.) tabular data much simpler than what is available in the DBF back-end. Also, there are several convenient graphical SQLite managers available, such as SQLite manager, SQLite data browser, and SQLite Admin.

Optimal Route in 3D

 
Premise:
Several data-loggers in steep terrain; how can we visit all of them in the most efficient manner such that we traverse the least cumulative slope gradient? In a sense this is a traveling salesman style problem, with travel costs defined by slope gradient. The v.net.salesman module in GRASS can be used to compute the optimal route between data-loggers, given: 1) a network of lines connecting all points to be visited and 2) transferal of slope cost information to the network. An example approach is listed below. Note that due to a bug in v.net.salesman, we need to use one extra step-- details below.

 
Premise

 
Premise
Wanted a simpler way to access the USGS seamless elevation look-up service. Python seemed like a logical start. Note that the response from the USGS webservice is not correctly identified as valid XML by the python XML-parser. Therefore there is a small amount of scrubbing used to coerce the response into valid XML. Comments on why this is, or is not, a good idea are welcome. Here is a link to an interactive version.
 
Update It looks like the USGS service does not accept POST-style requests. I have made some small changes to the script below.

 
Premise:

Setting the magnetic declination on a compass is a critical step in accurate measurement of bearings that can be translated to map or survey. As the location of the magnetic north pole is constantly moving, the magnetic declination reported on older topographic maps or compass housings are probably out of date. Current declination values for a single point, or for large regions can be found on the NOAA sites:

• single point
• global maps

These resources are helpful, but a current, detailed (state-level) map of magnetic declination would be interesting.